Arthroscopy offers significant advantages over open surgery in rotator cuff repair.
Minimally invasive techniques reduce post-operative pain and speed up recovery.
Functional results are comparable between arthroscopy and open surgery.
The use of arthroscopic techniques is increasing, and today represents the "gold standard"
Gabriele February
4 min. Feb 15, 2025

Arthroscopy offers significant advantages over open surgery in rotator cuff repair.
Rotator cuff repair is one of the most common surgical procedures for treating shoulder injuries. In recent years, the arthroscopic approach has gained popularity over open surgery due to its numerous advantages. This article will explore minimally invasive techniques for rotator cuff repair, comparing the results and clinical implications with open surgery.
The rotator cuff is a group of muscles and tendons that stabilize and move the shoulder joint. Injuries to this structure can cause pain, weakness, and limited movement, significantly impacting quality of life. Surgical repair is often necessary when conservative treatments are ineffective.
Traditionally, rotator cuff repair was performed through an open incision, which resulted in greater tissue trauma and a longer recovery. However, the advent of arthroscopic surgery has revolutionized this approach. Arthroscopic techniques use small incisions and specialized instruments to repair damaged tendons, reducing postoperative pain and speeding recovery. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair represents a significant advancement in orthopedic surgery. This minimally invasive procedure allows the surgeon to operate on the shoulder using generally two to four small incisions, each approximately 0.5–1 cm. Specialized instruments and a video camera are inserted through these small incisions, thus reducing tissue trauma compared to open surgery.
Numerous studies and systematic reviews have compared the outcomes of arthroscopic and open techniques. For example, a meta-analysis demonstrated that, although there are differences in recovery times and pain, functional outcomes, such as the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, are comparable between the two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis highlighted that arthroscopic techniques can lead to re-tear rates similar to those of open surgery, but with a significant improvement in postoperative quality of life.
The choice between arthroscopic and open surgery for rotator cuff repair depends on several factors, including the severity of the injury, the patient's age, and the surgeon's preference. However, evidence suggests that the arthroscopic approach offers significant advantages in terms of less invasiveness and faster recovery, making it a preferred option for many patients.