Ultrasound-guided or arthroscopic treatment of calcific tendinopathy (shoulder calcifications)
Ultrasound-guided or arthroscopic treatment for calcific tendinopathy: which should you choose?

TL;DR
Calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder is a condition characterized by the deposition of calcium crystals in the rotator cuff tendons, which can cause severe pain and limited movement. This condition is particularly common among middle-aged adults and can significantly impact quality of life. In recent years, several treatment options have emerged, including ultrasound-guided and arthroscopic techniques, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.
Calcific tendinopathy is a condition in which calcium deposits form in the tendons, particularly in the rotator cuff. These deposits can cause inflammation and pain, making it difficult to perform daily activities. Symptoms can range from mild to severe and include sharp pain, stiffness, and limited range of motion.
Ultrasound-guided treatment, such as ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation (US-PICT), has become one of the first choices for managing calcific tendinopathy. This technique involves the use of ultrasound to guide the insertion of a needle into the calcium deposit, allowing for aspiration of the calcified material and the injection of saline or anesthetic solutions. The advantages of this approach include:
Arthroscopy is a minimally invasive surgery that allows for visualization and treatment of shoulder conditions through small incisions. During arthroscopy, the surgeon can remove calcium deposits and repair any tendon injuries. The advantages of this approach include:
However, arthroscopy carries a higher risk of complications than ultrasound-guided techniques and requires a longer recovery period.
The choice between ultrasound-guided and arthroscopic treatment depends on various factors, including:
In conclusion, calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder is a common condition that can be effectively treated with ultrasound-guided or arthroscopic approaches. Treatment choices should be individualized based on the severity of the condition, response to conservative treatments, and patient preferences. It is essential that patients are informed about available options and potential outcomes so they can make informed decisions about their treatment.